584 results for 'cat:"Vehicle"'.
Per curiam, the Ninth District grants the pest control company's petition for a writ of mandamus. The company seeks to compel the trial court to withdraw its order denying its motion to compel a physical and mental examination of the parties' alleging injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Expert examination is required to obtain a fair trial and therefore necessitates the intrusion upon the injured parties' privacy.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: May 9, 2024, Case #: 09-24-00007-CV, Categories: Tort, vehicle, Experts
J. Miller finds the trial court properly convicted defendant of criminal mischief following a non-jury trial over a road rage incident. Defendant's challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction fail, as the record shows defendant intentionally swung a golf club at another motorist's car three times after the motorist retreated. Affirmed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Miller, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 22-2140, Categories: Evidence, vehicle
J. Gruber finds the county court properly granted the business owner's motion for summary judgment. The owner asserted that he did not own the accident-involved vehicle but had sold it to the driver through his auto salvage business on an installment agreement, with the state having issued the title to the driver. Though the driver was previously employed by the owner, at the time of the accident he was no longer employed, and the owner had no duty to confirm that he was licensed or insured. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Gruber , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: CV-23-258, Categories: vehicle, Negligence
J. Vaughan finds that the lower court improperly denied the state's petition to deny defendant pretrial release on charges of unlawful possession of a stolen vehicle. The defendant fled from police in the stolen vehicle, driving over spike strips and into oncoming traffic, hitting another car in a head-on collision before stopping. The state was not required to prove defendant was willing to use force necessary to cause great bodily harm. Reversed.
Court: Illinois Appellate Court, Judge: Vaughan, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 240231, Categories: Bail, vehicle
J. Pirtle finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for operating a motor vehicle to avoid arrest. Officers conducting surveillance on a home saw defendant drive by and, while following him, defendant began driving at excessive speeds and making sudden turns. Pursuit was ended for safety concerns and officers identified defendant through vehicle registration records and his prior booking photos. Sufficient evidence supports the conviction, and all factors were properly considered in sentencing him to two years in prison, as well as a license suspension. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Pirtle , Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: A-23-721, Categories: Drug Offender, Escape, vehicle
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Tharp grants Illinois’ motion to dismiss Volkswagen’s constitutional challenge to the Illinois Motor Vehicle Franchise Act, which makes it so independent auto dealerships operate independently of “legacy” auto manufacturers like Volkswagen, meaning Volkswagen can’t operate service centers in independent dealerships. But because new and pre-owned vehicles come with manufacturer warranties, Volkswagen still has to reimburse the independent dealerships for any repair and service work they do to their customers’ cars. Volkswagen claims a 2022 amendment to the Act meant to give auto repair workers greater compensation violates its free speech, due process and equal protection rights. But the court finds Volkswagen has failed to state an actionable claim for its due process and equal process claims, and lacks standing for its First Amendment allegations.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Tharp, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv7045, NOS: Constitutionality of State Statutes - Other Suits, Categories: Constitution, vehicle, Due Process
J. Kellum finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant for manslaughter after he allegedly struck the victim with a car. Defendant has not shown that he is entitled to relief in connection with his requested jury instruction. Also, there was no abuse of discretion in the lower court’s handling of an unsolicited statement defendant made to a police officer during transport. Affirmed.
Court: Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, Judge: Kellum, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: CR-2023-0611, Categories: Evidence, Manslaughter, vehicle
J. Lyle finds that the lower court properly denied the plaintiff driver's request for statutory costs and but improperly denied her prejudgment interest as the prevailing party in an arbitration proceeding stemming from a motor vehicle suit. The driver did not request costs in her litigation papers, which is a required step even before the arbitrator designated her as the prevailing party. However, as the assessment of interest does not qualify as "damages," the driver is still entitled to this money without having made a prior request to the arbitrator. Reversed in part.
Court: Illinois Appellate Court, Judge: Lyle, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 230079, Categories: Arbitration, vehicle, Damages
J. Wiseman finds the trial court properly vacated the default judgment. The judgment was entered against the at-fault driver in this auto collision suit after the owner of the damaged company vehicle accused her insurer, Allstate, of using a valuation that did not consider the pandemic's effect on fair market value and inflation. The petition to vacate was filed and the court found the at-fault driver was not in default when the judgment was entered, nor was she provided proper notice. Affirmed.
Court: Oklahoma Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Wiseman , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 121053, Categories: Insurance, vehicle, Due Process
J. Bahr finds that the district court improperly granted summary judgment to a business in a matter involving a vehicle which struck a pedestrian in front of the business. The court treated the individual's request to adopt a stipulation as a type of motion which it holds no jurisdiction over. The district court misapplied the law when it treated the request as the motion in question. Reversed.
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court, Judge: Bahr, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 2024ND81, Categories: vehicle, Jurisdiction
J. Quattlebaum finds the lower court improperly denied the officer’s motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity. A repossession representative called the police after the vehicle's owner refused to get out so he could tow it. The owner argued that the deputy who arrived and ordered her out of the vehicle violated her Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures of property by crossing the line from keeping the peace into actively participating. Because of the unique nature of the case and lack of case law, the deputy couldn't have known what he was doing was unconstitutional when he ordered her out of the car. Reversed.
Court: 4th Circuit, Judge: Quattlebaum , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 23-1344, Categories: Constitution, vehicle, Police Misconduct
J. McShan finds that the lower court improperly dismissed claims brought after a bicyclist was hit by a car while exiting a bike path. The cyclist admitted he failed to make a full stop at a stop sign located on the path before he entered the intersection, but questions of fact remain unresolved as to whether the driver should have seen the bicyclist as she made a left-hand turn. Reversed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: McShan, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: CV-23-1540, Categories: vehicle, Negligence
J. Adams denies, in part, a freight company and its truck driver’s motion for partial summary judgment in this motor vehicle collision stemming from the truck driver hitting another vehicle driven by a motorist. The motorist alleges negligent and wanton hiring, training, supervision, maintenance and entrustment against the freight company and negligence and wantonness violations for rules of the road regarding the driver. There is in fact a genuine issue of the driver’s actions, but the motorist fails to present any evidence on her claims against the freight company. The Alabama Uniform Traffic Crash Report has been struck in favor of the company and driver.
Court: USDC Middle District of Alabama, Judge: Adams, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv137, NOS: Motor Vehicle - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: vehicle, Negligence
J. Wilson finds that the lower court improperly dismissed the indictment charging defendant with involuntary manslaughter by deciding after viewing video surveillance that her driving did not constitute criminal negligence. The court was limited to reviewing whether the indictment contained the essential elements of involuntary manslaughter and whether it proper apprised defendant of the facts of the charge. Reversed.
Court: Missouri Supreme Court, Judge: Wilson, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: SC100212, Categories: Criminal Procedure, Manslaughter, vehicle
J. Vance grants the unopposed request for summary judgment to a Toyota manufacturer and a sales company, dismissing product liability claims by the driver of a 2014 Lexus ES350 who alleges injuries from the car’s airbag failure to deploy when he crashed into a guard rail. The Toyota companies presented certified medical records taken at the hospital where the litigant was treated after the accident, in which the treating physician stated that he reportedly “drank a significant amount of alcohol and then crashed his car on purpose [in] an attempt to end his life secondary to depression and suicidal thoughts after a break-up 5 months ago.” Furthermore, the litigant has failed to present evidence sufficient to establish the essential elements of his defective airbag claims.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Vance, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv4607, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Evidence, vehicle, Product Liability
J. Goldin finds that the trial court improperly ruled in tort liability claims brought after plaintiff was struck by a city vehicle when he stepped off a curb in the middle of a block to cross between two stopped vehicles, at which point the light changed, because the record does not indicate the accident had been caused by negligent hiring and retention of a city employee. Meanwhile, the record indicates plaintiff was at least 50% at fault.
Court: Tennessee Court of Appeals, Judge: Goldin, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: W2023-00437-COA-R3-CV, Categories: vehicle, Negligence
J. Schreier grants a motion for leave to proceed after an individual filed a pro se lawsuit under the False Claims Act. The action is sealed because the individual alleges it is a qui tam action, but the court wrote that it does not appear that the individual has served the government with a copy of his complaint and a written disclosure of substantially all material evidence. The matter stems from a dispute over car repairs at a shop in Worthington, Minnesota.
Court: USDC South Dakota, Judge: Schreier, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv5071, NOS: Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: Fraud, vehicle
J. Cummings partially grants an auto body shop’s motion for summary judgment on a former employee’s discrimination claims. The former employee claims she faced discrimination at work on the basis of her pregnancy, and was eventually fired. The court finds the former employee has abandoned her hostile work environment claim, as she did not respond to the auto shop’s argument against it, but allows the rest of her allegations to go forward.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Cummings, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv2524, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, vehicle, Employment Discrimination
J. Schreier grants a motion for leave to proceed after an individual filed a pro se lawsuit under the False Claims Act. The action is sealed because the individual alleges it is a qui tam action, but the court wrote that it does not appear that the individual has served the government with a copy of his complaint and a written disclosure of substantially all material evidence. The matter stems from a dispute over car repairs at a shop in Worthington, Minnesota.
Court: USDC South Dakota, Judge: Schreier, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv4189, NOS: Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: Fraud, vehicle
J. Byrne finds that the trial court properly ruled against a truck driver who collided with a vehicle that was disabled on the shoulder of the highway. The truck driver sued the other driver and his employer, alleging negligence due to his failure to place reflective cones behind his disabled vehicle. Despite the truck driver's arguments to the contrary, the exclusion of the on-scene trooper's testimony did not lead to an improper judgment. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Byrne, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 03-23-00266-CV, Categories: Tort, vehicle
J. Simons finds that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order restitution after the end of defendant's probation on a hit-and-run conviction. Where a restitution order is for losses caused by a collision and not for the criminal act of leaving the scene, the order is a condition of probation and jurisdiction may not extend beyond the termination of probation. Reversed.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Simons, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: A167703, Categories: Restitution, vehicle, Jurisdiction
J. Smith denies the insurer’s motion for summary judgment in this insurance dispute stemming from an uninsured motorist claim related to a collision involving the insured vehicle caused by another vehicle driver that fled the scene in Texas. The insurer argues the policy does not cover hit-and-runs in another state because the insured misrepresented the fact the vehicle would be garaged in Alabama and failed to timely provide the change in garaging. There is a genuine issue of material fact on if the policy was void from the beginning and that the evidence presented by the insurer fails to show that the vehicle was not at the policy’s garaged location.
Court: USDC Northern District of Alabama , Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv934, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Insurance, vehicle
J. Salter finds that the circuit court improperly granted summary judgment and remanded for further proceedings a matter concerning a dispute of ownership of a semi truck. However, the lower court correctly determined that “drafting errors” alleged by the semi owner would not, themselves, preclude obtaining the title to the property. Affirmed in part.
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court, Judge: Salter , Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 2024SD24, Categories: vehicle, Contract
J. Ortego finds that defendant was properly convicted for carjacking and adjudicated as a fourth habitual offender, resulting in a life sentence of hard labor without parole. There was plenty of evidence that defendant attacked the carjacking victim unprovoked, thus there was "violence" and all of the elements of the crime were established beyond a reasonable doubt. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Ortego, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: KA-23-736, Categories: Robbery, vehicle, Jury Instructions
J. Pirtle finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for assault, attempted possession of a deadly weapon by a prohibited person and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Defendant admitted to assaulting the victim and stealing his vehicle and firearms after the two had been involved in a drunken altercation. Though defendant says the victim had shot at him and missed before he punched him and stomped on his head, sufficient evidence supports the convictions. The record is insufficient to review claims of ineffective assistance, containing no discussions between defendant and his attorney regarding claims of self-defense. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Pirtle , Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: A-23-1000, Categories: Assault, Weapons, vehicle